Using Action-Based Hierarchies for Real-Time Diagnosis
From Tetherless World Wiki
Citation: David Ash and Barbara Hayes-Roth. (1995) Using Action-Based Hierarchies for Real-Time Diagnosis. In KSL-95-02, January,1995.
| Publication techreport ( Edit ) | |
| type | Technical Report |
| bibtype | techreport |
| Bibtex basics | |
| author | David Ash and Barbara Hayes-Roth |
| title | Using Action-Based Hierarchies for Real-Time Diagnosis |
| number | KSL-95-02 |
| institution | Knowledge Systems, AI Laboratory |
| address | Stanford, CA, USA |
| year | 1995 |
| month | January |
| Bibtex more | |
| Access Paper | |
| abstract | An intelligent agent diagnoses perceived problems so that it can respond to them appropriately. Basically, the agent performs a series of tests whose results discriminate among competing hypotheses. Given a specific diagnosis, the agent performs the associated action. Using the traditional information-theoretic heuristic to order diagnostic tests in a decision tree, the agent can maximize the information obtained from each successive test and thereby minimize the average time (number of tests) required to complete a diagnosis and perform the appropriate action. However, in real-time domains, even the optimal sequence of tests cannot always be performed in the time available. Nonetheless, the agent must respond. For agents operating in real-time domains, we propose an alternative action-based approach in which: (a) each node in the diagnosis tree is augmented to include an ordered set of actions, each of which has positive utility for all of its children in the tree; and (b) the tree is structured to maximize the expected utility of the action available at each node.Upon perceiving a problem, the agent works its way through the tree,performing tests that discriminate among successively smaller subsets of potential faults. When a deadline occurs, the agent performs the best available action associated with the most specific node it has reached so far. Although the action-based approach does not minimize the time required to complete a specific diagnosis, it provides positive-utility responses, with step-wise improvements in expected utility, throughout the diagnosis process. We present theoretical and empirical results contrasting the advantages and disadvantages of the information-theoretic and action-based approaches. |
| KSL Technical Report ID: KSL-95-02 |
Facts about Using Action-Based Hierarchies for Real-Time DiagnosisRDF feed
| Abstract | An intelligent agent diagnoses perceived p … An intelligent agent diagnoses perceived problems so that it can respond to them appropriately. Basically, the agent performs a series of tests whose results discriminate among competing hypotheses. Given a specific diagnosis, the agent performs the associated action. Using the traditional information-theoretic heuristic to order diagnostic tests in a decision tree, the agent can maximize the information obtained from each successive test and thereby minimize the average time (number of tests) required to complete a diagnosis and perform the appropriate action. However, in real-time domains, even the optimal sequence of tests cannot always be performed in the time available. Nonetheless, the agent must respond. For agents operating in real-time domains, we propose an alternative action-based approach in which: (a) each node in the diagnosis tree is augmented to include an ordered set of actions, each of which has positive utility for all of its children in the tree; and (b) the tree is structured to maximize the expected utility of the action available at each node.Upon perceiving a problem, the agent works its way through the tree,performing tests that discriminate among successively smaller subsets of potential faults. When a deadline occurs, the agent performs the best available action associated with the most specific node it has reached so far. Although the action-based approach does not minimize the time required to complete a specific diagnosis, it provides positive-utility responses, with step-wise improvements in expected utility, throughout the diagnosis process. We present theoretical and empirical results contrasting the advantages and disadvantages of the information-theoretic and action-based approaches. ion-theoretic and action-based approaches. |
| Address | Stanford, CA, USA + |
| Author | David Ash and Barbara Hayes-Roth + |
| Bibtype | techreport + |
| Has author | David Ash and Barbara Hayes-Roth + |
| Has identifier | KSL-95-02 + |
| Has publishing details | January,1995 + |
| Has title | Using Action-Based Hierarchies for Real-Time Diagnosis + |
| Has where published | KSL-95-02 + |
| Has year | 1995 + |
| Institution | Knowledge Systems, AI Laboratory + |
| Ksl tr id | KSL-95-02 + |
| Month | January + |
| Number | KSL-95-02 + |
| Process note | NO + |
| Title | Using Action-Based Hierarchies for Real-Time Diagnosis + |
| Year | 1995 + |
Resource > Thing > Entity > Document > Scientific Document > Publication
Resource > Thing > Entity > Document > Scientific Document > Publication > Technical Report
Resource > Thing > Entity > Document > Scientific Document > Publication > Technical Report > KSL Technical Report
