An Analysis of Categorical and Quantitative Methods for Planning under Uncertainty

From Tetherless World Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

KSL-88-63 +  redirect page

An Analysis of Categorical and Quantitative Methods for Planning under Uncertainty +  Has identifier

An Analysis of Categorical and Quantitative Methods for Planning under Uncertainty +  Ksl tr id

An Analysis of Categorical and Quantitative Methods for Planning under Uncertainty +  Number

An Analysis of Categorical and Quantitative Methods for Planning under Uncertainty

Bibtype  techreport

Has publishing details  1988

Has title  An Analysis of Categorical and Quantitative Methods for Planning under Uncertainty

Has where published  KSL-88-63

Has year  1988

Title  An Analysis of Categorical and Quantitative Methods for Planning under Uncertainty

Year  1988

Abstract  Decision theory and logical reasoning are Decision theory and logical reasoning are both methods for representing and solving medical decision problems. We analyze the usefulness of these two approaches to medical therapy planning by establishing a simple correspondence between decision theory and non-monotonic logic, a formalization of categorical logical reasoning. The analysis indicates that categorical approaches to planning can be viewed as comprising two decision-theoretic concepts: probabilities (degrees of belief in planning hypotheses) and utilities (degrees of desirability of planning outcomes). We present and discuss examples of the following lessons from this decision-theoretic view of categorical (nonmonotonic) reasoning: (1) Decision theory and artificial intelligence techniques are intended to solve different components of the planning problem. (2) When considered in the context of planning under uncertainty, nonmonotonic logics do not retain the domain-independent characteristics of classical logical reasoning for planning under certainty. (3) Because certain nonmonotonic programming paradigms (e.g., frame-based inheritance, rule-based planning, protocol-based reminders) are inherently problem-specific, they may be inappropriate to employ in the solution of certain types of planning problems. We discuss how these conclusions affect several current medical informatics research issues, including the construction of "very large" medical knowledge bases. n of "very large" medical knowledge bases.

Author  Curtis Langlotz and Edward H. Shortliffe +

Has author  Curtis Langlotz and Edward H. Shortliffe +

Has identifier  An Analysis of Categorical and Quantitative Methods for Planning under Uncertainty +

Institution  Knowledge Systems, AI Laboratory +

Ksl tr id  An Analysis of Categorical and Quantitative Methods for Planning under Uncertainty +

Number  An Analysis of Categorical and Quantitative Methods for Planning under Uncertainty +

Process note  YES +

Categories  KSL Technical Report +, Publication +, Technical Report +

 

Enter the name of the page to start browsing from.
Views
Personal tools