Some Ideas and Examples to Evaluate Ontologies
From Tetherless World Wiki
Citation: Asunción Gómez-Pérez. (1994) Some Ideas and Examples to Evaluate Ontologies. In KSL-94-65, October,1994.
| Publication techreport ( Edit ) | |
| type | Technical Report |
| bibtype | techreport |
| Bibtex basics | |
| author | Asunción Gómez-Pérez |
| title | Some Ideas and Examples to Evaluate Ontologies |
| number | KSL-94-65 |
| institution | Knowledge Systems, AI Laboratory |
| year | 1994 |
| month | October |
| Bibtex more | |
| Access Paper | |
| abstract | The lack of methods for evaluating ontologies in laboratories can be an obstacle to their use in companies. This technical report presents a set of emerging ideas in evaluation of ontologies useful for: (1) ontologies developers in the lab, as a foundation from which to perform technical evaluations; (2) end users of ontologies in companies, as a point of departure in the search for the best ontology for their systems; and (3) future research, as a basis upon which to perform progressive and disciplined investigations in this area. After exploring briefly some general questions such as: why, what, when, how and where to evaluate; who evaluates; and, what to evaluate against, we focus on the definition of a set of criteria useful in the evaluation process. Finally, we discuss, by using the Bibliographic-Data ontology, some of these criteria. |
| KSL Technical Report ID: KSL-94-65 |
Facts about Some Ideas and Examples to Evaluate OntologiesRDF feed
| Abstract | The lack of methods for evaluating ontolog … The lack of methods for evaluating ontologies in laboratories can be an obstacle to their use in companies. This technical report presents a set of emerging ideas in evaluation of ontologies useful for: (1) ontologies developers in the lab, as a foundation from which to perform technical evaluations; (2) end users of ontologies in companies, as a point of departure in the search for the best ontology for their systems; and (3) future research, as a basis upon which to perform progressive and disciplined investigations in this area. After exploring briefly some general questions such as: why, what, when, how and where to evaluate; who evaluates; and, what to evaluate against, we focus on the definition of a set of criteria useful in the evaluation process. Finally, we discuss, by using the Bibliographic-Data ontology, some of these criteria. ic-Data ontology, some of these criteria. |
| Author | Asunción Gómez-Pérez + |
| Bibtype | techreport + |
| Has author | Asunción Gómez-Pérez + |
| Has identifier | KSL-94-65 + |
| Has publishing details | October,1994 + |
| Has title | Some Ideas and Examples to Evaluate Ontologies + |
| Has where published | KSL-94-65 + |
| Has year | 1994 + |
| Institution | Knowledge Systems, AI Laboratory + |
| Ksl tr id | KSL-94-65 + |
| Month | October + |
| Number | KSL-94-65 + |
| Process note | NO + |
| Title | Some Ideas and Examples to Evaluate Ontologies + |
| Year | 1994 + |
Resource > Thing > Entity > Document > Scientific Document > Publication
Resource > Thing > Entity > Document > Scientific Document > Publication > Technical Report
Resource > Thing > Entity > Document > Scientific Document > Publication > Technical Report > KSL Technical Report
