Ideal Partition of Resources for Metareasoning
From Tetherless World Wiki
Citation: Eric Horvitz and John S. Breese. (1990) Ideal Partition of Resources for Metareasoning. In KSL-90-26, March,1990.
| Publication techreport ( Edit ) | |
| type | Technical Report |
| bibtype | techreport |
| Bibtex basics | |
| author | Eric Horvitz and John S. Breese |
| title | Ideal Partition of Resources for Metareasoning |
| number | KSL-90-26 |
| institution | Knowledge Systems, AI Laboratory |
| year | 1990 |
| month | March |
| Bibtex more | |
| Access Paper | |
| abstract | We can achieve significant gains in the value of computation by metareasoning about the nature or extent of base-level problem solving before executing a solution. However, resources that are irrevocably committed to metareasoning are not available for executing a solution. Thus, it is important to determine the portion of resources we wish to apply to metareasoning and control versus to the execution of a solution plan. Recent research on rational agency has highlighted the importance of limiting the consumption of resources by metareasoning machinery. We shall introduce the metareasoning-partition problem--the problem of ideally apportioning costly reasoning resources to planning a solution versus applying resource to executing a solution to a problem. We exercise prototypical metareasoning-partition models to probe the relationships between time allocated to metareasoning and to execution for different problem classes. Finally, we examine the value of metareasoning in the context of our functional analyses. |
| KSL Technical Report ID: KSL-90-26 |
Facts about Ideal Partition of Resources for MetareasoningRDF feed
| Abstract | We can achieve significant gains in the va … We can achieve significant gains in the value of computation by metareasoning about the nature or extent of base-level problem solving before executing a solution. However, resources that are irrevocably committed to metareasoning are not available for executing a solution. Thus, it is important to determine the portion of resources we wish to apply to metareasoning and control versus to the execution of a solution plan. Recent research on rational agency has highlighted the importance of limiting the consumption of resources by metareasoning machinery. We shall introduce the metareasoning-partition problem--the problem of ideally apportioning costly reasoning resources to planning a solution versus applying resource to executing a solution to a problem. We exercise prototypical metareasoning-partition models to probe the relationships between time allocated to metareasoning and to execution for different problem classes. Finally, we examine the value of metareasoning in the context of our functional analyses. in the context of our functional analyses. |
| Author | Eric Horvitz and John S. Breese + |
| Bibtype | techreport + |
| Has author | Eric Horvitz and John S. Breese + |
| Has identifier | KSL-90-26 + |
| Has publishing details | March,1990 + |
| Has title | Ideal Partition of Resources for Metareasoning + |
| Has where published | KSL-90-26 + |
| Has year | 1990 + |
| Institution | Knowledge Systems, AI Laboratory + |
| Ksl tr id | KSL-90-26 + |
| Month | March + |
| Number | KSL-90-26 + |
| Process note | NO + |
| Title | Ideal Partition of Resources for Metareasoning + |
| Year | 1990 + |
Resource > Thing > Entity > Document > Scientific Document > Publication
Resource > Thing > Entity > Document > Scientific Document > Publication > Technical Report
Resource > Thing > Entity > Document > Scientific Document > Publication > Technical Report > KSL Technical Report
