Evaluation of an Expert System Producing Geometric Solids as Output

From Tetherless World Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Citation: Case H. Ketting and Mary M. Austin-Seymour and Ira J. Kalet and Jonathan P. Jacky and Sharon E. Kromhout-Schiro and Sharon M. Hummel and Jonathan Unger and Lawrence M. Fagan. (1996) Evaluation of an Expert System Producing Geometric Solids as Output. In KSL-96-08, February,1996.

Publication techreport ( Edit )
type Technical Report
bibtype techreport
Bibtex basics
author Case H. Ketting and Mary M. Austin-Seymour and Ira J. Kalet and Jonathan P. Jacky and Sharon E. Kromhout-Schiro and Sharon M. Hummel and Jonathan Unger and Lawrence M. Fagan
title Evaluation of an Expert System Producing Geometric Solids as Output
number KSL-96-08
institution Knowledge Systems, AI Laboratory
year 1996
month February
Bibtex more
note Medical Computer Science
Access Paper
abstract This paper reports the evaluation of an expert system whose output is a three-dimensional geometric solid. Evaluating such an output emphasizes the problems of establishing a comparison standard, and of identifying and classifying deviations from that standard. Our evaluation design used a panel of physicians for the first task and a separate panel of expert judges for the second. We found that multi-parameter or multi-dimensional expert system outputs, such as this one, may result in lower overall performance scores and increased variation in acceptability to different physicians. We surmise that these effects are a consequence of the higher number of factors which may be deemed unacceptable. The effects appear, however, to be equal for computer and human output. This evaluation design is thus applicable to other expert systems producing similarly complex output.

KSL Technical Report ID: KSL-96-08
Facts about Evaluation of an Expert System Producing Geometric Solids as OutputRDF feed
Abstract This paper reports the evaluation of an ex … This paper reports the evaluation of an expert system whose output is a three-dimensional geometric solid. Evaluating such an output emphasizes the problems of establishing a comparison standard, and of identifying and classifying deviations from that standard. Our evaluation design used a panel of physicians for the first task and a separate panel of expert judges for the second. We found that multi-parameter or multi-dimensional expert system outputs, such as this one, may result in lower overall performance scores and increased variation in acceptability to different physicians. We surmise that these effects are a consequence of the higher number of factors which may be deemed unacceptable. The effects appear, however, to be equal for computer and human output. This evaluation design is thus applicable to other expert systems producing similarly complex output. ystems producing similarly complex output.
Author Case H. Ketting and Mary M. Austin-Seymour and Ira J. Kalet and Jonathan P. Jacky and Sharon E. Kromhout-Schiro and Sharon M. Hummel and Jonathan Unger and Lawrence M. Fagan  +
Bibtype techreport  +
Has author Case H. Ketting and Mary M. Austin-Seymour and Ira J. Kalet and Jonathan P. Jacky and Sharon E. Kromhout-Schiro and Sharon M. Hummel and Jonathan Unger and Lawrence M. Fagan  +
Has identifier KSL-96-08  +
Has publishing details February,1996  +
Has title Evaluation of an Expert System Producing Geometric Solids as Output  +
Has where published KSL-96-08  +
Has year 1996  +
Institution Knowledge Systems, AI Laboratory  +
Ksl tr id KSL-96-08  +
Month February  +
Note Medical Computer Science
Number KSL-96-08  +
Process note NO  +
Title Evaluation of an Expert System Producing Geometric Solids as Output  +
Year 1996  +
Retrieved from "http://tw.rpi.edu/wiki/Evaluation_of_an_Expert_System_Producing_Geometric_Solids_as_Output"
Personal tools