Construction of Normative Decision Models Using Abstract Graph Grammars
From Tetherless World Wiki
Citation: John W. Egar. (1994) Construction of Normative Decision Models Using Abstract Graph Grammars. In KSL-94-17, 1994.
| Publication techreport ( Edit ) | |
| type | Technical Report |
| bibtype | techreport |
| Bibtex basics | |
| author | John W. Egar |
| title | Construction of Normative Decision Models Using Abstract Graph Grammars |
| number | KSL-94-17 |
| institution | Stanford University |
| address | Stanford, CA, USA |
| year | 1994 |
| Bibtex more | |
| Access Paper | |
| abstract | This dissertation addresses automated assistance for decision analysis in medicine. In particular, I have investigated graph grammars as a representation for encoding how decision-theoretic models can be constructed from an unordered list of concerns. The modeling system that I have used requires a standard vocabulary to generate decision models; the models generated are qualitative, and require subsequent assessment of probabilities and utility values. This research has focused on the modeling of the qualitative structure of problems given a standard vocabulary and given that subsequent assessment of probabilities and utilities is possible. The usefulness of the graph-grammar representation depends on the graph-grammar formalism's ability to describe a broad spectrum of qualitative decision models, on its ability to maintain a high quality in the models it generates,and on its clarity in describing topological constraints to researchers who design and maintain the actual grammar. I have found that graph grammars can be used to generate automatically decision models that are comparable to those produced by decision analysts. |
| KSL Technical Report ID: KSL-94-17 |
Facts about Construction of Normative Decision Models Using Abstract Graph GrammarsRDF feed
| Abstract | This dissertation addresses automated assi … This dissertation addresses automated assistance for decision analysis in medicine. In particular, I have investigated graph grammars as a representation for encoding how decision-theoretic models can be constructed from an unordered list of concerns. The modeling system that I have used requires a standard vocabulary to generate decision models; the models generated are qualitative, and require subsequent assessment of probabilities and utility values. This research has focused on the modeling of the qualitative structure of problems given a standard vocabulary and given that subsequent assessment of probabilities and utilities is possible. The usefulness of the graph-grammar representation depends on the graph-grammar formalism's ability to describe a broad spectrum of qualitative decision models, on its ability to maintain a high quality in the models it generates,and on its clarity in describing topological constraints to researchers who design and maintain the actual grammar. I have found that graph grammars can be used to generate automatically decision models that are comparable to those produced by decision analysts. le to those produced by decision analysts. |
| Address | Stanford, CA, USA + |
| Author | John W. Egar + |
| Bibtype | techreport + |
| Has author | John W. Egar + |
| Has identifier | KSL-94-17 + |
| Has publishing details | 1994 + |
| Has title | Construction of Normative Decision Models Using Abstract Graph Grammars + |
| Has where published | KSL-94-17 + |
| Has year | 1994 + |
| Institution | Stanford University + |
| Ksl tr id | KSL-94-17 + |
| Number | KSL-94-17 + |
| Process note | NO + |
| Title | Construction of Normative Decision Models Using Abstract Graph Grammars + |
| Year | 1994 + |
Resource > Thing > Entity > Document > Scientific Document > Publication
Resource > Thing > Entity > Document > Scientific Document > Publication > Technical Report
Resource > Thing > Entity > Document > Scientific Document > Publication > Technical Report > KSL Technical Report
