Approximating Probabilistic Inference in Bayesian Belief Networks is NP-Hard
From Tetherless World Wiki
Citation: Paul Dagum and Michael Luby. (1993) Approximating Probabilistic Inference in Bayesian Belief Networks is NP-Hard. In KSL-91-53, April,1993.
| Publication techreport ( Edit ) | |
| type | Technical Report |
| bibtype | techreport |
| Bibtex basics | |
| author | Paul Dagum and Michael Luby |
| title | Approximating Probabilistic Inference in Bayesian Belief Networks is NP-Hard |
| number | KSL-91-53 |
| institution | Knowledge Systems, AI Laboratory |
| year | 1993 |
| month | April |
| Bibtex more | |
| Access Paper | |
| abstract | [[abstract::It is known that exact computation of probabilistic inference is NP-hard, [Cooper90]. For inferences that are not conditioned on any evidence nodes, it is relatively straightforward to get approximations in polynomial time with absolute error e and probability of failure d. However, the effort directed at finding efficient approximation algorithms for general inferences, i.e., inferences conditioned on evidence, has been met with little success. Polynomial time algorithms that approximate inferences with absolute or relative bounds have been constructed for special case belief networks only. We prove that even approximating probabilistic inference conditioned on evidence in general belief networks is NP-hard. We prove that if P is not equal to NP, there does not exist an algorithm that can output an estimate Z such that for some e<1/2, Pr[x|It is known that exact computation of probabilistic inference is NP-hard, [Cooper90]. For inferences that are not conditioned on any evidence nodes, it is relatively straightforward to get approximations in polynomial time with absolute error e and probability of failure d. However, the effort directed at finding efficient approximation algorithms for general inferences, i.e., inferences conditioned on evidence, has been met with little success. Polynomial time algorithms that approximate inferences with absolute or relative bounds have been constructed for special case belief networks only. We prove that even approximating probabilistic inference conditioned on evidence in general belief networks is NP-hard. We prove that if P is not equal to NP, there does not exist an algorithm that can output an estimate Z such that for some e<1/2, Pr[x]] |
| KSL Technical Report ID: KSL-91-53 |
Facts about Approximating Probabilistic Inference in Bayesian Belief Networks is NP-HardRDF feed
| Author | Paul Dagum and Michael Luby + |
| Bibtype | techreport + |
| Has author | Paul Dagum and Michael Luby + |
| Has identifier | KSL-91-53 + |
| Has publishing details | April,1993 + |
| Has title | Approximating Probabilistic Inference in Bayesian Belief Networks is NP-Hard + |
| Has where published | KSL-91-53 + |
| Has year | 1993 + |
| Institution | Knowledge Systems, AI Laboratory + |
| Ksl tr id | KSL-91-53 + |
| Month | April + |
| Number | KSL-91-53 + |
| Process note | YES + |
| Title | Approximating Probabilistic Inference in Bayesian Belief Networks is NP-Hard + |
| Year | 1993 + |
Resource > Thing > Entity > Document > Scientific Document > Publication
Resource > Thing > Entity > Document > Scientific Document > Publication > Technical Report
Resource > Thing > Entity > Document > Scientific Document > Publication > Technical Report > KSL Technical Report
