Theoharis2008graph GTW 1

From Semantic Portal Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search
  • Question is for the Presentation: Theoharis2008graph presented by Tim Lebo 4 dec 2008
  • Question is asked by: Gregory Todd Williams
  • The Question is: Section 4C(3), Distribution of Class Levels, states that a class c has level 0 if it is the root, and p+0 where p is the level of its parent otherwise. However, it goes on to say "if c has more than one parents, then p is the maximum of their levels" and also "The biggest number of classes is observed between the middle and the maximum leaf level." Isn't this latter observation strongly suggested by the former stated preference of the maximum level of multi-parented classes? Does this choice affect the results? Is any indication given of the frequency of multi-parented classes in the analyzed schemas?
Facts about Theoharis2008graph GTW 1RDF feed
Question askedSection 4C(3), Distribution of Class Level Section 4C(3), Distribution of Class Levels, states that a class c has level 0 if it is the root, and p+0 where p is the level of its parent otherwise. However, it goes on to say "if c has more than one parents, then p is the maximum of their levels" and also "The biggest number of classes is observed between the middle and the maximum leaf level." Isn't this latter observation strongly suggested by the former stated preference of the maximum level of multi-parented classes? Does this choice affect the results? Is any indication given of the frequency of multi-parented classes in the analyzed schemas? -parented classes in the analyzed schemas?
Question asked byGregory Todd Williams  +
Question for the PresentationTheoharis2008graph presented by Tim Lebo 4 dec 2008  +
Semantic Web Community
Tetherless World constellation
maintenance