]> 2012-05-27T21:10:11-04:00 Grau2007history question 1 by lebo The authors open the abstract by stating, "The development of ontologies involves continuous but relatively small modifications." A reasonable first step to reduce the ontology development cycle is to tackle the problem addressed in the paper: classify ontology O^2 by reusing the "evidences" from the classification of O^1, the set of added axioms, and the set of removed axioms. Their "module" technique can then be applied at each committed change. This addresses the '''relatively small modifications''' aspect of ontology development, # but what about the '''continuous''' aspect? # Could "modules" be determined using a history longer than only the previous step? The authors open the abstract by stating, "The development of ontologies involves continuous but relatively small modifications." A reasonable first step to reduce the ontology development cycle is to tackle the problem addressed in the paper: classify ontology O^2 by reusing the "evidences" from the classification of O^1, the set of added axioms, and the set of removed axioms. Their "module" technique can then be applied at each committed change. This addresses the '''relatively small modifications''' aspect of ontology development, # but what about the '''continuous''' aspect? # Could "modules" be determined using a history longer than only the previous step? Text Joshua Taylor 20080918 Presentation Question for the Presentation Question asked by Question asked Joshua A. Taylor Question answered by User:Tim Lebo Author Grau2007history About Question A Presentation Questions