| Question asked
|
Comment: The authors have chosen to omit …
Comment: The authors have chosen to omit discussions on rho-iso and rho-join semantic associations. I believe that for each kind of association required different approach to semrank evaluation. For eg.
*in rho-iso association relation between rm and rn (last elements of the two paths) would be important. Association would be entirely different if rm and rn belong to disjoint classes, and not same class.
*Similarly, for rho-join association the relation between properties on the path from r1 to rn and those on the path from r2 to rn may matter. Again, association may be different if the two paths contain disjoint properties, rather than similar (including subProperty) properties.
Can you give your thoughts on the following: If r1 and r2 are associated by more than 1 type of association (rho-path, rho-iso or rho-join), which associations would be ranked higher? which associations would be ranked higher?
|
