| Question asked
|
IMHO, this paper describes roughly two cat … IMHO, this paper describes roughly two categories of approaches to evaluate tag-relatedness -one qualitative and one semantic. Is it possible to combile these two kinds of approaches so that they can complement each other? E.g., when we are evaluating the relatedness between tags written in Chinese and Indian, is simply using semantic grounding enough to reach a sound relatedness between them? If not, do other qualitative metrics mentioned in this paper have any merit? cs mentioned in this paper have any merit?
|
