| Question asked
|
Out of curiosity, why didn't the authors u … Out of curiosity, why didn't the authors use OWL for their ontology? They model their own cardinality semantics which could be replaced (granted, with different usage) by standard OWL constructs. If you look at their ontology (http://www.argdf.org/source/ArgDF_Ontology.rdfs), it shows that they've also defined their own InverseProperty semantics. (As a side note, I was surprised to find so many syntactical errors in the RDF/XML snippets for a journal article.) e RDF/XML snippets for a journal article.)
|
