| Question asked
|
The Gene Ontology seems to be the only ont … The Gene Ontology seems to be the only ontology for which update sizes are varied during evaluation (with n=1,2,4) whereas the other ontologies are all tested for a fixed update size. Are the gains in reclassification time seen in the results expected to be the same across all ontologies, regardless of update size? Furthermore, is the seemingly narrow range of tested update sizes (1-4) expected to approximate real-world usage? Would the same gains be seen with updates of different characteristics such as unbalanced axiom removal/addition counts or larger updates (tens or hundreds of affected axioms)? tes (tens or hundreds of affected axioms)?
|
