| A
|
Question +
|
| About
|
Grau2007history +
|
| Author
|
Tim Lebo +
|
| Modification dateThis property is a special property in this wiki.
|
27 November 2008 14:17:29 +
|
| Question answered by
|
Joshua A. Taylor +
|
| Question asked
|
The authors open the abstract by stating, … The authors open the abstract by stating, "The development of ontologies involves continuous but relatively small modifications." A reasonable first step to reduce the ontology development cycle is to tackle the problem addressed in the paper: classify ontology O^2 by reusing the "evidences" from the classification of O^1, the set of added axioms, and the set of removed axioms. Their "module" technique can then be applied at each committed change. This addresses the '''relatively small modifications''' aspect of ontology development,
# but what about the '''continuous''' aspect?
# Could "modules" be determined using a history longer than only the previous step? istory longer than only the previous step?
|
| Question asked by
|
Tim Lebo +
|
| Question for the Presentation
|
Joshua Taylor 20080918 Presentation +
|
| Text
|
The authors open the abstract by stating, … The authors open the abstract by stating, "The development of ontologies involves continuous but relatively small modifications." A reasonable first step to reduce the ontology development cycle is to tackle the problem addressed in the paper: classify ontology O^2 by reusing the "evidences" from the classification of O^1, the set of added axioms, and the set of removed axioms. Their "module" technique can then be applied at each committed change. This addresses the '''relatively small modifications''' aspect of ontology development,
# but what about the '''continuous''' aspect?
# Could "modules" be determined using a history longer than only the previous step? istory longer than only the previous step?
|
| Categories |
Presentation Questions
|
