| Question asked
|
Section 1.1.3 essentially describes the vo … Section 1.1.3 essentially describes the vocabulary for temporal labeling as RDF reification with temporal information hanging off the equivalent of an rdf:Statement. Could this potentially introduce unexpected results? For example, if :subj1 owl:sameAs :subj2, then by inference, all of the temporal information attached to triples with subject :subj1 would also be attached to triples with subject :subj2. This is a problem for the traditional usage of reification (providing metainformation about triples), but is it a problem for this case? It seems reasonable that if :s :p :o is true for a time frame, and :s owl:sameAs :s2, then :s2 :p :o would also be true for the same time frame. What do you think? Do you foresee any such issues with this approach? oresee any such issues with this approach?
|
