| A
|
Question +
|
| About
|
Cattuto2008semantic +
|
| Author
|
Tim Lebo +
|
| Modification dateThis property is a special property in this wiki.
|
27 November 2008 14:12:06 +
|
| Question asked
|
I don't understand the statement "The reas … I don't understand the statement "The reason for giving weight zero between a node and itself is that we want two tags to be considered related when they occur in a '''similar context''', and not when they '''occur together'''.
# What is the difference between "similar context" and "occur together"? I would think that they are the same.
# Isn't "occurrence" the only "context" that the Folksonomy formalism provides? t" that the Folksonomy formalism provides?
|
| Question asked by
|
Tim Lebo +
|
| Question for the Presentation
|
Semantic Grounding Joshua Shinavier 20089011 +
|
| Text
|
I don't understand the statement "The reas … I don't understand the statement "The reason for giving weight zero between a node and itself is that we want two tags to be considered related when they occur in a '''similar context''', and not when they '''occur together'''.
# What is the difference between "similar context" and "occur together"? I would think that they are the same.
# Isn't "occurrence" the only "context" that the Folksonomy formalism provides? t" that the Folksonomy formalism provides?
|
