| A
|
Question +
|
| About
|
Cattuto2008semantic +
|
| Author
|
Tim Lebo +
|
| Modification dateThis property is a special property in this wiki.
|
27 November 2008 14:10:49 +
|
| Question asked
|
The paper compares five relatedness metric … The paper compares five relatedness metrics. We could sit down and make up ten more.
# What does a "good" metric look like?
# How do we avoid a subjective evaluation of a metric's results? (e.g.,"An interesting observation is also that ''java'' and ''python'' could be considered as siblings in some suitable concept hierarchy")
# If we had the perfect metric (m*), what would we do with it? ect metric (m*), what would we do with it?
|
| Question asked by
|
Tim Lebo +
|
| Question for the Presentation
|
Semantic Grounding Joshua Shinavier 20089011 +
|
| Text
|
The paper compares five relatedness metric … The paper compares five relatedness metrics. We could sit down and make up ten more.
# What does a "good" metric look like?
# How do we avoid a subjective evaluation of a metric's results? (e.g.,"An interesting observation is also that ''java'' and ''python'' could be considered as siblings in some suitable concept hierarchy")
# If we had the perfect metric (m*), what would we do with it? ect metric (m*), what would we do with it?
|
