Owl-s technology for representing constraints and capabilities of web services

From Semantic Portal Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

{{#vardefine:category|Publication}}{{#vardefine:templatename|i.publication}}{{#vardefine:package|smwbp_instance_templates}}

Edit
{{#vardefine:authoreditor|Katia Sycara, David Martin, Deborah L. McGuinness, Sheila McIlraith, Massimo Paolucci}}

Reference: {{#vardefine:pagename|owl-s technology for representing constraints and capabilities of web services }}

  1. [[]]

bibtex

{{#vardefine:pagename|Owl-s technology for representing constraints and capabilities of web services }}{{#vardefine:key| }}

abstract: Description of constraints and capabilities of Web services is crucial to enable flexible service discovery, interaction and management. Constraints and capabilities are at the heart of representing policies that govern the behavior of Web services. Because policies regulate the behavior of different parties they are effective if and only if they are unambiguously understood by all the parties that they regulate. To achieve this level of common understanding policies should be expressed in terms of shared ontologies that are based on a logic shared by every party. For this reason, we believe that the starting point of any activity on expressing policies, capabilities and constraints should take into account the work that has been developed in the context of Semantic Web services, and specifically OWL-S.

download:

Facts about Owl-s technology for representing constraints and capabilities of web servicesRDF feed
AbstractDescription of constraints and capabilitie Description of constraints and capabilities of Web services is crucial to enable flexible service discovery, interaction and management. Constraints and capabilities are at the heart of representing policies that govern the behavior of Web services. Because policies regulate the behavior of different parties they are effective if and only if they are unambiguously understood by all the parties that they regulate. To achieve this level of common understanding policies should be expressed in terms of shared ontologies that are based on a logic shared by every party. For this reason, we believe that the starting point of any activity on expressing policies, capabilities and constraints should take into account the work that has been developed in the context of Semantic Web services, and specifically OWL-S. ntic Web services, and specifically OWL-S.
AddressRedwood Shores, CA  +
AuthorKatia Sycara  +, David Martin  +, Deborah L. McGuinness  +, Sheila McIlraith  +, and Massimo Paolucci  +
Bibtypeinproceedings  +
BooktitleW3C Workshop on Constraints and Capabilities for Web Services  +
Key2004owl-s  +
MonthOctober  +
NoteOn behalf of the OWL-S Coalition, In collaboration with Tim Finin, Grit Denker, Lalana Kagal  +
Paper urlhttp://www.w3.org/2004/08/ws-cc/dmowls-20040904  +
TagComputer science  +
TitleOWL-S Technology for Representing Constraints and Capabilities of Web Services  +
Year2004  +
Personal tools
Semantic Web Community
Tetherless World constellation
maintenance