Gregory Todd Williams SPARQL BGP Optimization Presentation Joshua Shinavier 1

From Semantic Portal Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search
  • Question is for the Presentation: Gregory Todd Williams SPARQL BGP Optimization Presentation
  • Question is asked by: Joshua Shinavier
  • The Question is: What is it about the presented approach which makes it appropriate only for in-memory RDF repositories? I don't understand why the same arguments and techniques would not apply to disk-based stores.
  • Answer: The same arguments would likely apply to native disk-based stores. The paper makes the false distinction between in-memory stores and disk-based RDBMS stores. The choice to ignore RDBMS-based stores is legitimate, since RDBMS have their own optimization frameworks. However, native disk-based stores (those that store RDF directly themselves) would likely see similar efficiency gains based on the presented optimizer.
Facts about Gregory Todd Williams SPARQL BGP Optimization Presentation Joshua Shinavier 1RDF feed
AnswerThe same arguments would likely apply to n The same arguments would likely apply to native disk-based stores. The paper makes the false distinction between in-memory stores and disk-based RDBMS stores. The choice to ignore RDBMS-based stores is legitimate, since RDBMS have their own optimization frameworks. However, native disk-based stores (those that store RDF directly themselves) would likely see similar efficiency gains based on the presented optimizer. cy gains based on the presented optimizer.
Question askedWhat is it about the presented approach which makes it appropriate only for in-memory RDF repositories? I don't understand why the same arguments and techniques would not apply to disk-based stores.
Question asked byJoshua Shinavier  +
Question for the PresentationGregory Todd Williams SPARQL BGP Optimization Presentation  +
Personal tools
Semantic Web Community
Tetherless World constellation
maintenance