GTW Time in RDF Jesse Weaver

Question is for the Presentation: GTW Time in RDF
Question is asked by: Jesse Weaver
The Question is: Section 1.1.3 essentially describes the vocabulary for temporal labeling as RDF reification with temporal information hanging off the equivalent of an rdf:Statement. Could this potentially introduce unexpected results? For example, if :subj1 owl:sameAs :subj2, then by inference, all of the temporal information attached to triples with subject :subj1 would also be attached to triples with subject :subj2. This is a problem for the traditional usage of reification (providing metainformation about triples), but is it a problem for this case? It seems reasonable that if :s :p :o is true for a time frame, and :s owl:sameAs :s2, then :s2 :p :o would also be true for the same time frame. What do you think? Do you foresee any such issues with this approach?

Question asked	Section 1.1.3 essentially describes the vo … Section 1.1.3 essentially describes the vocabulary for temporal labeling as RDF reification with temporal information hanging off the equivalent of an rdf:Statement. Could this potentially introduce unexpected results? For example, if :subj1 owl:sameAs :subj2, then by inference, all of the temporal information attached to triples with subject :subj1 would also be attached to triples with subject :subj2. This is a problem for the traditional usage of reification (providing metainformation about triples), but is it a problem for this case? It seems reasonable that if :s :p :o is true for a time frame, and :s owl:sameAs :s2, then :s2 :p :o would also be true for the same time frame. What do you think? Do you foresee any such issues with this approach? oresee any such issues with this approach?
Question asked by	Jesse Weaver +
Question for the Presentation	GTW Time in RDF +