For NSPARQL Jesse Weaver 20080911 1

From Semantic Portal Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Casually: Can nSPARQL have a better representation? Isn't SPARQL (& SQL) very intuitive? A thought: Some large repositories prefer performing reasoning and storing inferred data to speed up query answering. If NSPARQL works well we can avoid some redundancy such as storing: Tom is Human, when data contains Tom is Boy.

Facts about For NSPARQL Jesse Weaver 20080911 1RDF feed
Question askedHow good is O(G) complexity (w.r.t. large How good is O(G) complexity (w.r.t. large amount of data)? What could the average case complexity be?

Casually: Can nSPARQL have a better representation? Isn't SPARQL (& SQL) very intuitive?

A thought: Some large repositories prefer performing reasoning and storing inferred data to speed up query answering. If NSPARQL works well we can avoid some redundancy such as storing: Tom is Human, when data contains Tom is Boy.
m is Human, when data contains Tom is Boy.
Question asked byAnkesh Khandelwal  +
Question for the PresentationNSPARQL Jesse Weaver 20080911  +
Personal tools
Semantic Web Community
Tetherless World constellation
maintenance