Construction of normative decision models using abstract graph grammars
From Semantic Portal Wiki
{{#vardefine:category|Publication}}{{#vardefine:templatename|i.publication}}{{#vardefine:package|smwbp_instance_templates}}
| Edit |
Reference: {{#vardefine:pagename|construction of normative decision models using abstract graph grammars }}
- [[]]
bibtex
{{#vardefine:pagename|Construction of normative decision models using abstract graph grammars }}{{#vardefine:key| }}
abstract: This dissertation addresses automated assistance fordecision analysis in medicine. In particular, I have investigated graphgrammars as a representation for encoding how decision-theoretic models can beconstructed from an unordered list of concerns. The modeling system that Ihave used requires a standard vocabulary to generate decision models; themodels generated are qualitative, and require subsequent assessment ofprobabilities and utility values. This research has focused on the modeling ofthe qualitative structure of problems given a standard vocabulary and giventhat subsequent assessment of probabilities and utilities is possible. Theusefulness of the graph-grammar representation depends on the graph-grammarformalism's ability to describe a broad spectrum of qualitative decisionmodels, on its ability to maintain a high quality in the models it generates,and on its clarity in describing topological constraints to researchers whodesign and maintain the actual grammar. I have found that graph grammars canbe used to generate automatically decision models that are comparable to thoseproduced by decision analysts.
download:
- paper:
- slides:
| Abstract | This dissertation addresses automated assi … This dissertation addresses automated assistance fordecision analysis in medicine. In particular, I have investigated graphgrammars as a representation for encoding how decision-theoretic models can beconstructed from an unordered list of concerns. The modeling system that Ihave used requires a standard vocabulary to generate decision models; themodels generated are qualitative, and require subsequent assessment ofprobabilities and utility values. This research has focused on the modeling ofthe qualitative structure of problems given a standard vocabulary and giventhat subsequent assessment of probabilities and utilities is possible. Theusefulness of the graph-grammar representation depends on the graph-grammarformalism's ability to describe a broad spectrum of qualitative decisionmodels, on its ability to maintain a high quality in the models it generates,and on its clarity in describing topological constraints to researchers whodesign and maintain the actual grammar. I have found that graph grammars canbe used to generate automatically decision models that are comparable to thoseproduced by decision analysts. ble to thoseproduced by decision analysts. |
| Address | Stanford, CA, USA + |
| Author | John W. Egar + |
| Bibtype | techreport + |
| Institution | Stanford University + |
| Key | KSL-94-17 + |
| Number | KSL-94-17 + |
| Tag | Computer science + |
| Title | Construction of Normative Decision Models Using Abstract Graph Grammars + |
| Tr id | KSL-94-17 + |
| Year | 1994 + |

