Cattuto2008semantic question 6 by lebo

From Semantic Portal Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

CSCI 6966 Advanced Semantic Web (Fall 2008)


A Question from Tim Lebo about cattuto2008semantic:

I don't understand the statement "The reason for giving weight zero between a node and itself is that we want two tags to be considered related when they occur in a similar context, and not when they occur together.

  1. What is the difference between "similar context" and "occur together"? I would think that they are the same.
  2. Isn't "occurrence" the only "context" that the Folksonomy formalism provides?

Semantic Grounding Joshua Shinavier 20089011

Facts about Cattuto2008semantic question 6 by leboRDF feed
AQuestion  +
AboutCattuto2008semantic  +
AuthorTim Lebo  +
Question askedI don't understand the statement "The reas I don't understand the statement "The reason for giving weight zero between a node and itself is that we want two tags to be considered related when they occur in a similar context, and not when they occur together.
  1. What is the difference between "similar context" and "occur together"? I would think that they are the same.
  2. Isn't "occurrence" the only "context" that the Folksonomy formalism provides? t" that the Folksonomy formalism provides?
Question asked byTim Lebo  +
Question for the PresentationSemantic Grounding Joshua Shinavier 20089011  +
TextI don't understand the statement "The reas I don't understand the statement "The reason for giving weight zero between a node and itself is that we want two tags to be considered related when they occur in a similar context, and not when they occur together.
  • What is the difference between "similar context" and "occur together"? I would think that they are the same.
  • Isn't "occurrence" the only "context" that the Folksonomy formalism provides? t" that the Folksonomy formalism provides?
  • Semantic Web Community
    Tetherless World constellation
    maintenance